Live chat! Log in Register. Search titles only. Search Advanced search…. What's new New posts New profile posts Latest activity. Search forums. Disconnected From Server Always. Thread starter Battler Start date May 28, Status Not open for further replies.
Hey guys idk what is up with pokemon showdown but every time i try to get online to pokemon showdown I always get this stupid screen that tells me i have been discoonnected because the server was probably reset. Only thing i have been having this screen pop up every time i try to log on for the past month or so. No server is down that long, I thought it also might be something with my firewall but when i turned my firewall completely off it still pulled up the stupid message.
Best of luck on your projects and broadcast. Fakee sure. Hey Fakee, I'm online right now. Sounds good, I should be free then. Hi, something came up and I don't think I'm gonna be online for the rest of the day. You can take the win. Lizardu'' kk thx. I can play anytime next week after 7pm my time. Algeria pm'd you already on ps about it but is it possible to play another time, something came up im sorry.
Yeah no problem, just lmk whenever you're free. El Cadaver still waiting. Hi El Cadaver, I'm sorry about missing the time, something important came up and I was unable to get online. I'll be on main ASAP. Hey, we have to play ORAS for a tour, when can u do it? Hi Raichy, I was waiting online for a bit and didn't see you, please let me know when you're online and I can try to play then.
We have people starting to actually change the game, not for convenience or in a practical sense. This is actually why we have Phil here. He needs to have the ability to tell us all to shut the fuck up if we are doing something absurd. If you're upset about the way this was handled, I'm sorry you feel that way, but you can direct your anger to the critical hit thread because that was essentially the "last straw". Blame Game said:. I'm sorry, but who do you think you are? This is factual evidence that the people who voted yes in the polls I wasn't one of them were actually right.
That's Right! I support Phil in this. What the hell kind of forum is Policy Review going to be if every time a new Gen comes out, everyone who ever complained about Hax is going to make us vote on whether or not we like critical hits? Our flagship metagame mechanics are not a matter of what we like, it's a matter of what is in Pokemon.
If you want to play Psuedo-Pokemon with no crits and no "hax" then go and build a simulator with those mehcanics changes and go and do that. Point blank we should be discussing which elements of Pokemon as they exist should be in and out of our flagship metagame. Either we exclude something because of its mechanics or we keep it in as it exists rather than change its mechanical characteristics.
Yeah, that's a just who was allowed in Policy Review and b was believed by most people to address crap like Acid Weather, not critical hits. I sincerely doubt the 72 people who voted for us not diliberately following cartridge mechanics envisioned we'd be whining about critical hits when they voted.
I'm supportive of Philip in his decision, and I think it's the right one. People here will be sour about it now, but it will prevent situations like this from resurfacing in the future. Maybe I'm incorrect in assuming this, but I don't believe even half of those voters would have voted against complete adherence to the cartridge if it weren't for the fact that it would directly violate our ability to implement classic Sleep Clause.
Heysup said:. Ulevo said:. I feel it is necessary to note that Philip wouldn't have had to ignore the poll vote in the first place if the Policy Review members accepted the terms of the poll result.
With all the controversial debate spawned from the creation of this thread I think it is fairly obvious that wasn't the case. I'm not sure what else you should really be expecting. I fully support my boy Phil in his decision. Just because we play our own metagame does not mean that we should be changing the game mechanics. Our job should be to accurately simulate in-game mechanics so that we don't end up with a situation like OmegaDonut said:.
I guess I'm too used to buggy Shoddybattle. Huy said:. By changing the game mechanics we would be alienating one of the biggest parts of the site -- WiFi.
Why is there a need to make this gap even bigger? We didn't unimplement CH's, but there's still the matter of "and other elements of hax" which have yet to be brought up but were in the topic title so. Point being that it's too open-ended when people construe "not neccesarilly conforming to catridge" to "conformance need not apply.
Then obi reopened it with more arguments after the overwhelming defeat. So is Phil in charge or isn't he?
There is clearly an undercurrent that believes we can still play competitive Pokemon if we remove elements of the game we find undesirable, no matter how much it makes our metagame deviate from what we will face in tournaments. Can we really call ourselves a competitive Pokemon site if we ban critical hits?
Is that going to be the case in Wifi or in tournaments? Of course it isn't. It has no precedent in the games, and it just sets a bad example. Nowhere does Phil state he is Smogon's new God, nor is he trying to lord his position over us and claim our contributions are irrelvant or dated. I just want to say how disappointed I am that we go through a 3 week long debate, have a vote of all the policy review members, wind up with a decision that a supermajority of the policy makers agree on, and then have it just up and overturned because of a vocal superminority.
0コメント